Tuesday, 07 July 2009
-
Marrying for Money

I was watching an old episode of Friends when Rachel says to Monica of her billionaire boyfriend, "The theme to your wedding could be: Look how much money we have! ...You could start with a money salad. It would be a little dry, but people would love it!"
Of course everyone's heard of the classic case of women marrying rich men for their money. People may have their different opinions on whether it's true love or not in cases like Anna Nicole and 89 year old husband J. Howard Marshall.

Would you marry for money?
Post a Comment
- Back to dollarish's Dollarish Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in dollarish's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)












Comments (38)
I'll be impressed if any women answer this.
My answer, of course, is that I probably wouldn't. But, having never been approached with the possibility (no billionaire chicks at my church, y'know?), I can't say for sure. Still, I can't imagine myself doing that; i'd be very unhappy.
Never. I just wrote an entry about whether or not I want to be rich or poor and I find this to be conveniently posted a few hours I wrote it. :)
Well, I am going to say No Way!! With righteous anger, spit flying all over, and eyes flashing crimson. But when a millionaire approaches me with a marriage offer... Let's just say I might rethink that... *whistles*
My boyfriend is pretty well off, but that's certainly not the reason I'm with him. In fact, it's not even factored in with my list of reasons.
@methodElevated@xanga - lol you have a list....
I would marry someone that had money, if the attraction was there. I probably would consider an offer of marriage with someone with money that was offering a business/partnership transaction, if I thought that we could grow as a couple and that I would be financially secure if things didn't work out. But only because I'm single ATM.
I have been offered a number of transactions for money, none of which I've ever taken up because it would be a little to much like prostitution in my books, and although I've known 'working' people and had friendships with them, and not judged them for their choosen profession, that's just something I would not do.
For me sex between a man and a woman, should at least be fun, ideally it be intimate and special. I don't see that happening if you were paid for it. Having said that, though, the reason I would consider marriage with someone who offered to take care of me, is because I do believe that the man should be the primary source of income within a family. If the woman wants to work, fine, however, I believe, and it's only my opinion so before anyone crusifies me, that the woman has a duty within the house and as a partner to her husband.
That doesn't mean I think women should be subservient slaves, nor does it mean that I don't think anything else could work. It just means in a relationship with traditional gender roles, I think that the women performs best and is most satified being the mans helpmeet. Heart and home of the household.
The only things that would make me hesitate/not consider marriage for the sake of financial security would be;
1. If there was no way that I would ever find my partner attractive.
2. If there was something about his nature that I found completely repulsive.
3. If under no circumstances did he ever want children.
and how ironic this post is, i was JUST watching friends !
@Wing_zero21@xanga - Only a rudimentary mental list.
most vehemently HELL NO.
Never.
I'm capable of making my own money, thank you.
When I become either mentally retarded or lose all my appendages and become sessile, I'll reconsider (if I'm even able to think).
I saw this episode the other night too!!!!!! HAHAHAA. But me? Marry for money? Nah. It would be a very nice addition, but I'd rather be ridiculously happy, in love and poor. When you're in the right mindset and happy in your life, money finds its way if you work for it. If it falls out of a tree and in my wallet, even better =)
Of course not! I'd like to make my own money for myself, thank you. :]
I wouldn't marry just for the money, but I'll admit that it certainly wouldn't hurt.
nope.
I wouldn't marry someone just for their money but if I were already dating them and I found out they had money, that would be fine with me.
Funny thing happened the other day as I was walking home from the Apple store after midnight with my brother. Ah I'll have to blog about it to explain.
I wouldn't marry someone JUST for their money.
Especially if they are a jerk!
That depends: is the payout in cash? LOL
@Diedra@xanga - lulz
No I wouldn't. Having all that money isn't going to make me happy for the rest of my life.
As a wife and mother that is forced to work to meet the family's household budget, I wish that my husband was capable of supporting all of us on his income alone. I am deeply unahappy about having to be a part of the harsh and uncaring corporate world and would much rather indulge my kids with my time and attention than work all day every day in a company that doesn't care about me at all.
Many books and Working Mother magazine say that women have come such a long way, career wise, but I think we have gone backwards. I long for the old times when a mother had a choice of whether to work or raise her kids. I feel a deep dissatisfaction with my situation and in turn resent my husband for that.
So, I would say that if I were to do it over again, I would make sure before I got married that my husband's salary could cover all household expenses when we have kids. I suggest this to any young women who are considering marraige and want to have children. I wouldn't necessarily have to marry rich, but would make sure that I could be a stay at home mother without financial consequences.
Believe me, you don't even think about having kids or not working when you are young, in love and planning a wedding. But it all comes to a sad and heart wrenching reality when you have a little sweet baby that is only a tender 6 weeks old and you have to hand the baby to a stranger to take care of him for the entire day. Not a happy time (and believe me, you will end up resenting your husband in the long run).
Everyone has choices in life. @keywest - After paying for someone else to take care of your baby, the gas, the money to pay for work clothes, lunches and eating out, I didn't feel it was worth the money to work. There are lots of ways to cut down on expenses and econimize if someone really sits down and thinks about it. Being young and starting a new job, most don't think to put aside some money, but spend spend spend. Now we know that we have to have something for emergencies. If you marry just for money, you may be very disappointed when their money is gone. There has to be more to the relationship.
*sigh*
yes, i would.
No way. I know someone who did and it lasted all of 2 years...1 1/2 of which he was overseas.
I would not marry specifically for money. But in all honesty, I would not even consider marrying someone if he didn't have a job and would be able to support both of us or my kids. Call me old fashion, but I grew up in a house, a neighborhood, and a school that the men were always the bread winners. My boyfriend and I have talked about it. He's a southern gentleman and has the same beliefs as me. I would not marry strictly for money, but it's something to consider. Not saying he has to be a millionaire because I am going to work and I love working. There are many factors to consider when marrying someone and if someone says they don't marry for a little bit of money reasons, they're lying. I don't know a single girl who would marry a homeless guy no matter how attractive he was and I don't know a girl who would marry a guy without considering what their financial situation would be.
I don't intend on ever getting married but, no, I wouldn't marry for money.
Marry for love. Materialistic things aren't permanent but love can be.